Anker SOLIX C300 or BLUETTI EB3A?
Two stations of the same size. Here is what really separates the Anker SOLIX C300 and the BLUETTI EB3A, with the brands’ own numbers.
In short
- Anker SOLIX C300 has more battery (+7%).
- BLUETTI EB3A is more powerful: better for devices that pull a lot.
Side by side
| Anker SOLIX C300 | BLUETTI EB3A | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 288 Wh | 268 Wh |
| Max power | 300 W | 600 W |
| Weight | — | 4.6 kg |
| Max solar | — | 200 W |
How long each one runs your devices
| Device | Anker SOLIX C300 | BLUETTI EB3A |
|---|---|---|
| Fridge | no | no |
| Chest freezer | no | no |
| Internet router | ≈ 12 h | ≈ 11 h |
| CPAP machine | ≈ 1.4 nights | ≈ 1.3 nights |
| Laptop | ≈ 3.5 h | ≈ 3.3 h |
| TV | ≈ 2.7 h | ≈ 2.5 h |
| LED lamp | ≈ 14 h | ≈ 13 h |
| Phone | ≈ 16 charges | ≈ 15 charges |
Brand numbers, not our own tests. Runtime = Wh × 0.85 ÷ (device watts + 10 W).